Comparison

Enkrypt vs MetaMask, without the tribal answer

Both are self-custodial wallets. The useful difference is where they expect you to work and how much of the non-Ethereum world you need in the same window.

7 minute read

Reviewed October 30, 2026

Independent editorial. Check the official Enkrypt site before downloading.

Choose Enkrypt if multichain support on desktop is the priority. Choose MetaMask if you live mostly in the Ethereum ecosystem and want its mobile app and broad dApp recognition. Neither choice removes the need to protect a recovery phrase or read transaction prompts.

The short comparison

Enkrypt is stronger when…

  • You hold Bitcoin, Solana or Polkadot alongside EVM assets.
  • You want one desktop-browser wallet for several ecosystems.
  • You like the option of a Mac App Store app.
  • Open-source code and a long-running wallet team matter to you.

MetaMask is stronger when…

  • Almost everything you do is on Ethereum and EVM networks.
  • You need a mature mobile wallet as well as desktop.
  • You want the wallet most dApps list first.
  • You rely on MetaMask's broader account and network tooling.

Side-by-side

FeatureEnkryptMetaMask
Primary formBrowser extension; Mac app availableBrowser extension and mobile app
Built byMyEtherWallet, Inc.Consensys
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
Open sourceYes, public GitHub repositoryCore wallet code is open source, with some components under other licences
Native non-EVM chainsBitcoin, Solana, Polkadot, Substrate and moreEVM networks are the primary focus
EVM networksEthereum, L2s and many EVM chainsEthereum, L2s and many EVM chains
Hardware walletsLedger and TrezorLedger and other hardware integrations
Mobile appNot officially listed; browser extension focusYes
Mac desktop appYes, Mac App Store listingThrough browser extension in a Mac browser
Swaps and bridgesIn-wallet swaps and cross-chain routesIn-wallet swaps and bridges
NFT supportYesYes
Best fitMultichain users on desktopEVM users who want the broadest ecosystem and mobile

Product details change. Verify current capabilities on each wallet's official site before choosing.

Chains and ecosystem

Enkrypt's defining claim is native multichain support. It lists Ethereum, EVM L2s, Bitcoin, Solana, Polkadot and Substrate networks, plus many other chains. That breadth is useful if you are tired of installing a different wallet for every ecosystem.

MetaMask's centre of gravity is Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks. That focus is also its strength: more EVM dApps recognise it, its account and network tooling is mature, and its mobile app carries the same wallet to your phone.

Breadth is not automatically better. A wallet with more chains also presents more networks where you can make a wrong-network mistake. The discipline is the same in either app: check the network before you send.

Desktop, mobile and Mac

Enkrypt is strongest as a desktop-browser wallet. It works in Chrome, Edge, Brave, Firefox, Opera and Safari, and MyEtherWallet also lists a Mac App Store app. Its official help documentation does not present a mobile app, so phone-first users are not the target audience.

MetaMask has a browser extension and a mobile app, which makes it easier to move between a computer and a phone. If you need both, that is a real advantage, not a branding preference.

Enkrypt desktop paths

Extension on Windows, macOS, Linux and ChromeOSMac App Store app for macOS 12.3+No official native Windows or Linux app

MetaMask platform paths

Browser extension on desktopMobile app for iOS and AndroidNo separate Mac App Store wallet listing

Security and custody

Both are self-custodial wallets. Both ask you to protect a recovery phrase, both support hardware wallets, and both can be used to sign a malicious transaction if you approve it. Switching wallets does not remove personal responsibility for the phrase or the prompt.

Enkrypt is open source and built by MyEtherWallet. The company says it does not collect personal data or track account addresses and balances. MetaMask is also widely used and audited, but it is a larger product surface with more integrations and a mobile app. Read each vendor's current privacy and security documentation rather than relying on a comparison table.

How to choose

  1. List the networks you actually use. If Bitcoin, Solana or Polkadot are part of your routine, Enkrypt's native support is a practical advantage.
  2. Decide whether mobile matters. If you need the same wallet on a phone, MetaMask has the more established path.
  3. Check the dApps you use. A wallet that a dApp does not recognise is friction. Test with a small transaction.
  4. Start with a small amount. Whatever you choose, verify the receive-and-send path before moving a meaningful balance.

Leaning toward Enkrypt?

Start with the verified install path and a small first transaction.

Install guide

Sources

This guide is independent and educational. Wallet features and store listings change; verify details with the official Enkrypt site and MyEtherWallet Help Center before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.

Built with ExaSpark